GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States derives from the common law, and is codified in various state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based upon certain characteristics or "safeguarded categories". The United States Constitution likewise restricts discrimination by federal and state federal governments against their public workers. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a number of areas, including recruiting, hiring, job evaluations, promo policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws frequently extend protection to additional categories or employers.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers usually can not discriminate versus staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] nationwide origin, [1] disability (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] insolvency or bad debts, [9] hereditary details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term homeowners, short-term residents, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight address employment discrimination, but its restrictions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to safeguard federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government does not deny individuals of "life, liberty, or property", without due procedure of the law. It likewise contains an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly forbids states from violating an individual's rights of due procedure and equivalent defense. In the work context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by treating employees, former employees, or job candidates unequally since of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that civil servant have a fair procedural process before they are ended if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination costs (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically offer their particular federal government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal government's authority to control a private organization, including civil liberties laws, comes from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically afford some security from public and personal employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just resolve discriminatory treatment by the federal government, including a public employer.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that regulate the economic sector are generally Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws created to secure public health, security and morals. All States need to stick to the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States might enact civil rights laws that offer extra employment security.

For example, some State civil rights laws use security from work discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, despite the fact that such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has actually established in time.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is implemented by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act restricts employers and unions from paying various earnings based upon sex. It does not prohibit other prejudiced practices in working with. It supplies that where employees carry out equal work in the corner needing "equivalent ability, effort, and duty and performed under comparable working conditions," they must be provided equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to employers engaged in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a substantial amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in a lot more aspects of the employment relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to the majority of companies taken part in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and employment service. Title VII prohibits discrimination based upon race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate based upon secured characteristics regarding terms, conditions, and opportunities of work. Employment service might not discriminate when working with or referring candidates, and labor organizations are likewise restricted from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, specifying that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, childbirth, and associated medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal specialists and subcontractors on account of race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or nationwide origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal contractors". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The forbidden practices are nearly similar to those detailed in Title VII, except that the ADEA protects workers in firms with 20 or more employees rather than 15 or more. A staff member is safeguarded from discrimination based on age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and prohibited necessary retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that also supply big pensions). The ADEA consists of specific standards for advantage, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of the majority of discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy versus age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal specialists with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal financial support. [16] It needs affirmative action as well as non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs sensible lodging, and Section 508 needs that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled employees. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators versus miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal contractors". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids work discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than three staff members from victimizing anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove prejudiced barriers against certified people with specials needs, people with a record of a disability, or people who are considered as having a disability. It restricts discrimination based on real or viewed physical or psychological disabilities. It also requires companies to supply sensible lodgings to staff members who require them because of a disability to get a task, carry out the important functions of a job, or take pleasure in the advantages and benefits of employment, unless the employer can reveal that undue difficulty will result. There are strict restrictions on when an employer can ask disability-related concerns or require medical assessments, and all medical information must be treated as personal. An impairment is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably restricts one or more major life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, modified in 1993, guarantee all persons equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages available to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using individuals' hereditary details when making hiring, shooting, task placement, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not explicitly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not clearly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment securities for LGBT people were patchwork; a number of states and localities explicitly harassment and predisposition in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public workers. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's identified that transgender workers were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender workers report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT community have lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who declares that her boss told her that her presence might make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]
Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and personal workplaces. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public work environments. [27] Some challengers of these laws believe that it would intrude on religious liberty, even though these laws are focused more on inequitable actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually likewise recognized that these laws do not infringe free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes also offer comprehensive defense from employment discrimination. Some laws extend comparable security as provided by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply security to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws provide greater protection to workers of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists classifications not secured by federal law. Age is consisted of too, because federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - matriculation, individual appearance [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Civil servant

Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state governments have additional protections against employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 prohibits discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact job performance. The Office of Personnel Management has analyzed this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the interpretation would be expanded to consist of gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public employees retain their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies can limitations workers' speech in particular methods. [93] Public staff members maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal employees who have work discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should sue in the proper federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of concerns for complainants.

Exceptions

Authentic occupational qualifications

Employers are usually permitted to consider characteristics that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are authentic occupational credentials (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police security can match races when essential. For instance, if police are running operations that involve private informants, or undercover representatives, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and employ officers that are proportionate to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not use in the show business, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, producers and casting personnel are allowed to cast characters based upon physical qualities, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are rare in the entertainment industry, particularly in performers. [95] This validation is special to the show business, and does not transfer to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage spaces in between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company needs to stabilize personal privacy and safety interest in the number of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, consumer preference alone can not be a reason unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail establishments in rural areas can not forbid African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the consumer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that handle children survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If an employer were trying to show that work discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there must be an accurate basis for believing that all or significantly all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task safely and effectively or that it is impractical to identify credentials on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a sinister intention does not convert a facially discriminatory policy into a neutral policy with an inequitable effect. [97] Employers likewise carry the problem to reveal that a BFOQ is reasonably necessary, and a lesser prejudiced option technique does not exist. [98]
Religious employment discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with individuals differently in their employment because of their religion, their spiritual beliefs and practices, and/or their request for accommodation (a modification in a work environment guideline or policy) of their faiths and practices. It likewise consists of treating people in a different way in their work because of their lack of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, companies are restricted from declining to hire a specific based upon their religious beliefs- alike race, sex, age, and disability. If a worker thinks that they have experienced spiritual discrimination, they should resolve this to the supposed transgressor. On the other hand, employees are secured by the law for reporting task discrimination and are able to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have stipulations that ban discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer certain exemptions in these laws to businesses or institutions that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different locations, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have been maintained and others reversed over time.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are utilizing religions against changing the body and preventative medicine as a validation to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not enable staff members to apply for spiritual exemptions, or decline their application may be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are specific requirements for workers to present evidence that it is a seriously held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has dealt with criticism for forbiding females from serving in combat functions. In 2016, however, the law was changed to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the post published on the PBS site, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the way in which black guys were dealt with in the military during the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans a possibility to prove themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to defend the country they resided in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the job rights of people who willingly or involuntarily leave employment positions to carry out military service or particular types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids employers from victimizing employees for previous or present participation or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that give choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to enforce systemic diverse treatment of women since there is a huge underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim due to the fact that there was no inequitable intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly discriminate against a safeguarded category might still be unlawful if they produce a disparate influence on members of a secured group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they are related to task performance.

The Act requires the elimination of artificial, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to leave out Negroes can not be shown to be connected to task efficiency, it is restricted, regardless of the company's absence of prejudiced intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been recognized by the EEOC as having a diverse influence on nationwide origin minorities. [108]
When safeguarding versus a disparate effect claim that declares age discrimination, a company, however, does not need to demonstrate necessity; rather, it must simply reveal that its practice is reasonable. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are contained in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its guidelines and setiathome.berkeley.edu standards are consisted of in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to file suit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative remedies by filing an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against certified people with impairments by federal contractors and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each firm has and enforces its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary support. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which prohibits discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT work discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against individuals with rap sheets in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits office predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful discriminatory practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General Of The United States|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [permanent dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment since of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their hiring practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US females in battle". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to protect older employees. Weak to begin with, she states that the ADEA has actually been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.