GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States stems from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and local laws. These laws restrict discrimination based upon specific qualities or "safeguarded classifications". The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state federal governments versus their public employees. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has ended up being based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a number of areas, consisting of recruiting, working with, job evaluations, promo policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws often extend protection to additional categories or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, companies usually can not discriminate against workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] beliefs, [1] national origin, [1] impairment (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] bankruptcy or bad debts, [9] genetic info, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term citizens, short-lived citizens, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly deal with employment discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to safeguard federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property", without due procedure of the law. It likewise includes an implicit guarantee that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly prohibits states from breaking a person's rights of due procedure and equivalent security. In the employment context, these Constitutional provisions would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by treating employees, previous staff members, or job applicants unequally since of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that federal government workers have a fair procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly give their particular federal government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to control a personal organization, including civil liberties laws, originates from their power to control all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically afford some protection from public and personal employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only resolve discriminatory treatment by the federal government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that manage the personal sector are typically Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws created to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States must adhere to the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that provide extra work defense.

For example, some State civil rights laws use protection from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, despite the fact that such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually established in time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids companies and unions from paying various incomes based on sex. It does not forbid other discriminatory practices in working with. It offers that where workers carry out equivalent operate in the corner requiring "equal skill, effort, and responsibility and performed under comparable working conditions," they should be provided equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers participated in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial amount of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in lots of more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII developed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to most companies engaged in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor companies, and employment companies. Title VII forbids discrimination based on race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it illegal for employers to discriminate based upon secured attributes relating to terms, conditions, and advantages of employment. Employment agencies might not discriminate when employing or referring candidates, and labor companies are also forbidden from basing membership or union categories on race, color, faith, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act modified Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination includes discrimination based upon pregnancy, giving birth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and job pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "prohibits discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, forbids employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are nearly identical to those laid out in Title VII, other than that the ADEA secures workers in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. An employee is secured from discrimination based on age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and forbade compulsory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise supply big pensions). The ADEA contains explicit standards for benefit, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy against age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of special needs by the federal government, federal contractors with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable lodging, and Section 508 needs that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled workers. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators against miners who experience "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam period veterans by federal specialists". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of insolvency or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than 3 staff members from victimizing anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove discriminatory barriers versus qualified individuals with impairments, individuals with a record of a special needs, or individuals who are concerned as having an impairment. It prohibits discrimination based upon real or viewed physical or mental impairments. It also needs employers to provide reasonable accommodations to workers who require them due to the fact that of an impairment to get a job, perform the vital functions of a task, or delight in the benefits and opportunities of employment, unless the employer can reveal that undue hardship will result. There are rigorous limitations on when a company can ask disability-related questions or require medical exams, and all medical information should be dealt with as personal. An impairment is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "significantly limits one or more significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, job amended in 1993, guarantee all persons equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages offered to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using people' hereditary info when making hiring, firing, task positioning, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not explicitly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not clearly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment securities for LGBT people were patchwork; numerous states and areas explicitly prohibit harassment and bias in work choices on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public workers. [22] Prior job to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT workers; the EEOC's determined that transgender employees were protected under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to include sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the work environment. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender employees report some kind of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many people in the LGBT community have actually lost their job, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who declares that her boss told her that her presence might make other individuals feel uncomfortable. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private offices. A few more states prohibit LGBT discrimination in just public work environments. [27] Some challengers of these laws believe that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, even though these laws are focused more on inequitable actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually also recognized that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes likewise provide comprehensive defense from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable security as supplied by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes offer security to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher defense to employees of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists categories not protected by federal law. Age is consisted of as well, since federal law only covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - matriculation, individual look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Civil servant

Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state governments have additional securities versus employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact job performance. The Office of Personnel Management has translated this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the interpretation would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public staff members retain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies deserve to limits staff members' speech in certain methods. [93] Public employees maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]
Federal employees who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to take legal action against in the proper federal jurisdiction, which presents a different set of problems for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are normally enabled to consider characteristics that would otherwise be inequitable if they are authentic occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement monitoring can match races when essential. For example, if police are running operations that include personal informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for job a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are proportionate to the community's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the entertainment market, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting staff are permitted to cast characters based upon physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, and so on. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are rare in the show business, particularly in performers. [95] This justification is distinct to the show business, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense validation in wage spaces between different groups of employees. [96] Cost can be considered when a company must balance privacy and security interest in the number of positions that an employer are attempting to fill. [96]
Additionally, consumer preference alone can not be a justification unless there is a privacy or safety defense. [96] For instance, retail establishments in rural locations can not restrict African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that handle kids survivors of sexual abuse is permitted.

If an employer were trying to show that employment discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there should be a factual basis for believing that all or significantly all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task securely and efficiently or that it is not practical to determine certifications on an individualized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a malicious motive does not convert a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with an inequitable impact. [97] Employers also bring the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is fairly required, and a lesser discriminatory option technique does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with people in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their religious beliefs, their religions and practices, and/or their ask for accommodation (a change in an office guideline or policy) of their faiths and practices. It also includes treating people in a different way in their work since of their absence of faith or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employers are restricted from declining to hire an individual based upon their religion- alike race, sex, age, and disability. If a staff member believes that they have experienced religious discrimination, they must address this to the alleged transgressor. On the other hand, staff members are protected by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have provisions that ban discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer particular exemptions in these laws to companies or organizations that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, however, to varying degrees in different areas, depending upon the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been promoted and others reversed gradually.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many workers are utilizing spiritual beliefs against changing the body and preventative medication as a justification to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not permit staff members to apply for religious exemptions, or reject their application may be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are specific requirements for employees to present proof that it is a truly held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 explicitly allows discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has dealt with criticism for restricting females from serving in fight roles. In 2016, however, the law was changed to permit them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the way in which black males were treated in the military during the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites offered the African Americans an opportunity to show themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were just permitted to work as servants; their involvement was restricted to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to protect the nation they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of people who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to undertake military service or specific kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise restricts employers from victimizing staff members for past or present involvement or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that provide preference to veterans versus non-veterans has actually been alleged to impose systemic disparate treatment of females because there is a large underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim since there was no inequitable intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight victimize a secured classification may still be unlawful if they produce a diverse effect on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have a prejudiced impact, unless they belong to job performance.

The Act requires the elimination of artificial, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to employment that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to leave out Negroes can not be shown to be connected to job performance, it is restricted, notwithstanding the employer's absence of discriminatory intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been determined by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on national origin minorities. [108]
When resisting a disparate effect claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to show necessity; rather, it must just show that its practice is sensible. [citation needed]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement arrangements are consisted of in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its guidelines and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file suit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative solutions by filing an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to filing their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs imposes Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination against certified people with impairments by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and imposes its own regulations that use to its own programs and to any entities that receive monetary help. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based on citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT work discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against individuals with rap sheets in the United States Racial wage gap in the United States Gender pay space in the United States Criticism of credit history systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits workplace bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Tabulation, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in particular activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General Of The United States|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [permanent dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment because of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their employing practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and job Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for more US females in battle". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Causing the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to protect older workers. Weak to begin with, she specifies that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.