GitLab

Employment discrimination law in the United States derives from the typical law, and is codified in many state, federal, and regional laws. These laws forbid discrimination based on certain attributes or "protected classifications". The United States Constitution also restricts discrimination by federal and state federal governments against their public workers. Discrimination in the personal sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a number of areas, including recruiting, employing, job assessments, promo policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws frequently extend security to extra classifications or companies.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers generally can not discriminate versus workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] faith, [1] national origin, [1] disability (physical or psychological, including status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] insolvency or uncollectable bills, [9] genetic information, [10] and citizenship status (for people, irreversible residents, short-term homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX


Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly address work discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to protect federal government employees.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due process of the law. It likewise contains an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly restricts states from violating an individual's rights of due process and equal protection. In the employment context, these Constitutional provisions would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by dealing with workers, previous employees, or job candidates unequally due to the fact that of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that civil servant have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are ended if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to complimentary speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the stipulation that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination costs (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their respective government the power to enact civil liberties laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal government's authority to manage a personal company, consisting of civil liberties laws, originates from their power to control all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly afford some defense from public and private employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only attend to inequitable treatment by the government, consisting of a public employer.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that control the economic sector are generally Constitutional under the "authorities powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws created to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States must stick to the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States may enact civil rights laws that use extra work security.

For instance, some State civil rights laws use security from work discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such forms of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil rights laws.

of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has established gradually.

The Equal Pay Act amended the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act restricts companies and unions from paying different wages based on sex. It does not restrict other prejudiced practices in working with. It supplies that where employees carry out equal work in the corner needing "equal skill, effort, and responsibility and performed under comparable working conditions," they ought to be offered equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers engaged in some element of interstate commerce, or all of a company's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a considerable amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in many more aspects of the employment relationship. "Title VII developed the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to the majority of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 employees, labor companies, and employment service. Title VII restricts discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It makes it prohibited for companies to discriminate based upon safeguarded characteristics concerning terms, conditions, and opportunities of work. Employment service might not discriminate when hiring or referring candidates, and labor organizations are likewise prohibited from basing subscription or union categories on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act modified Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "prohibits discrimination by federal professionals and subcontractors on account of race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal contractors". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and modified in 1978 and 1986, restricts companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost similar to those detailed in Title VII, except that the ADEA protects employees in firms with 20 or more employees rather than 15 or more. A staff member is safeguarded from discrimination based on age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and restricted compulsory retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that also offer big pensions). The ADEA consists of specific guidelines for benefit, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy against age discrimination among federal specialists". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal specialists with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal monetary support. [16] It needs affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable accommodation, and Section 508 requires that electronic and details innovation be accessible to disabled employees. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 forbids discrimination by mine operators versus miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam era veterans by federal contractors". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts work discrimination on the basis of insolvency or bad financial obligations. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than 3 workers from discriminating against anybody (other than an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate discriminatory barriers against qualified individuals with specials needs, individuals with a record of a special needs, or people who are considered having an impairment. It prohibits discrimination based on real or viewed physical or psychological disabilities. It also needs companies to offer affordable accommodations to employees who need them because of a disability to apply for a job, carry out the essential functions of a task, or take pleasure in the benefits and privileges of work, unless the company can reveal that unnecessary hardship will result. There are strict limitations on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or require medical assessments, and all medical information should be treated as personal. A disability is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably restricts several significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, ensure all individuals equal rights under the law and describe the damages available to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from utilizing individuals' hereditary details when making hiring, shooting, job positioning, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not clearly include sexual preference and 29 US states do not clearly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's prohibition of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment protections for LGBT people were patchwork; several states and localities clearly prohibit harassment and bias in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's figured out that transgender staff members were protected under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to include sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT neighborhood have actually lost their job, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who claims that her boss informed her that her existence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]
Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and private offices. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public workplaces. [27] Some opponents of these laws think that it would invade spiritual liberty, despite the fact that these laws are focused more on inequitable actions, not beliefs. Courts have likewise recognized that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]
State law

State statutes likewise provide comprehensive security from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable protection as offered by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide defense to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher security to staff members of the state or of state contractors.

The following table lists classifications not protected by federal law. Age is included also, because federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - enlisting, individual appearance [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]
Civil servant

Title VII likewise uses to state, federal, regional and other public workers. Employees of federal and state governments have extra securities versus work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not impact task performance. The Office of Personnel Management has analyzed this as restricting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the analysis would be broadened to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public staff members keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies have the right to limitations staff members' speech in specific ways. [93] Public staff members retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]
Federal workers who have work discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to sue in the correct federal jurisdiction, which positions a various set of issues for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational qualifications

Employers are usually enabled to think about attributes that would otherwise be inequitable if they are authentic occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement surveillance can match races when needed. For instance, if authorities are running operations that include private informants, or undercover agents, sending an African American officer into a sting for king-wifi.win a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and hire officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are permitted to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, and so on. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the entertainment industry, specifically in performers. [95] This reason is special to the entertainment market, and does not transfer to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, companies will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage spaces between various groups of workers. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company needs to balance privacy and safety issues with the variety of positions that an employer are trying to fill. [96]
Additionally, client preference alone can not be a justification unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For circumstances, retail facilities in backwoods can not prohibit African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that manage kids survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If a company were trying to prove that work discrimination was based upon a BFOQ, there should be an accurate basis for believing that all or considerably all members of a class would be not able to carry out the job securely and effectively or that it is impractical to figure out credentials on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a sinister motive does not convert a facially discriminatory policy into a neutral policy with an inequitable effect. [97] Employers also carry the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is reasonably needed, and a lower discriminatory alternative technique does not exist. [98]
Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with individuals differently in their work since of their religion, their faiths and practices, and/or their ask for lodging (a modification in a workplace rule or policy) of their faiths and practices. It likewise includes dealing with people in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their lack of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, companies are forbidden from refusing to hire an individual based on their religion- alike race, sex, age, and impairment. If a worker thinks that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they must address this to the supposed culprit. On the other hand, employees are protected by the law for reporting task discrimination and have the ability to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have clauses that prohibit discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer particular exemptions in these laws to organizations or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different locations, depending upon the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been upheld and others reversed over time.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many workers are utilizing spiritual beliefs versus altering the body and preventative medication as a validation to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not permit workers to apply for religious exemptions, or decline their application might be charged by the worker with employment discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are particular requirements for employees to present proof that it is a genuinely held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 clearly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has dealt with criticism for restricting ladies from serving in combat functions. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was changed to permit them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. blogs about the method which black males were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites gave the African Americans a possibility to show themselves as Americans by having them get involved in the war. The National Geographic website states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their participation was restricted to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to safeguard the nation they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the task rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or certain types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids companies from discriminating versus employees for previous or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to impose systemic disparate treatment of females because there is a large underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has declined this claim because there was no inequitable intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly victimize a safeguarded category might still be illegal if they produce a disparate influence on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have a discriminatory effect, unless they relate to task efficiency.

The Act requires the removal of synthetic, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be connected to job performance, it is prohibited, notwithstanding the employer's lack of inequitable intent. [107]
Height and weight requirements have been recognized by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]
When resisting a diverse effect claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to show need; rather, it should simply reveal that its practice is reasonable. [citation required]
Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interprets and enforces the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are consisted of in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file suit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination versus certified individuals with impairments by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each firm has and enforces its own regulations that use to its own programs and to any entities that receive monetary assistance. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based on citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices take the role of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
Employment Non-Discrimination Act LGBT employment discrimination in the United States Employment discrimination against individuals with criminal records in the United States Racial wage space in the United States Gender pay gap in the United States Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States
References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ). ^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525 ^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015. ^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260. ^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330. ^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009. ^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009. ^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans work environment predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015. ^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015. ^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016. ^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)". ^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019. ^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009. ^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment since of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [long-term dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009. ^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "Addressing Sexual Preference Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. ^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their hiring practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US ladies in battle". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023. ^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019. ^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "Pre 1965: Events Leading to the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023. ^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009. ^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009. ^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009. External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).

• Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to safeguard older workers. Weak to begin with, she mentions that the ADEA has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.