GitLab

U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for severe conversation of American foreign policy and global affairs. The publication has actually featured contributions from lots of prominent worldwide affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.[foreignaffairs](http://www.lagerado.de).com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://gitlab.lycoops.be). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a crucial intelligence obstacle in its burgeoning competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance images from The second world war might no longer provide adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance capabilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency stimulated an adventurous moonshot initiative: oke.zone the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In only a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering essential intelligence, recording images of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the international order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States need to make the most of its first-rate economic sector and adequate capacity for innovation to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community should harness the of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The combination of expert system, especially through large language models, uses groundbreaking opportunities to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the shipment of faster and more relevant support to decisionmakers. This technological transformation features substantial disadvantages, however, specifically as enemies exploit similar advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from enemies who may utilize the innovation for ill, and first to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security community, satisfying the pledge and handling the hazard of AI will require deep technological and cultural changes and a determination to change the method agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while mitigating its inherent threats, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners all over the world, how the nation intends to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to reinvent the intelligence community lies in its capability to process and examine huge amounts of data at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big amounts of gathered information to create time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems' pattern acknowledgment abilities to recognize and alert human analysts to possible risks, such as missile launches or military motions, or important global advancements that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This capability would ensure that vital cautions are prompt, actionable, and relevant, permitting more reliable reactions to both rapidly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which incorporate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For instance, using AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence might provide a detailed view of military motions, enabling quicker and more precise threat assessments and potentially brand-new ways of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can also unload repetitive and time-consuming tasks to makers to focus on the most satisfying work: producing original and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's general insights and performance. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence companies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The abilities of language designs have grown increasingly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's just recently released o1 and o3 designs showed considerable progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be used to even more quickly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on higher quantities of non-English information might be efficient in critical subtle differences between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community could focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be difficult to discover, frequently battle to get through the clearance process, and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language products available across the best firms, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can promptly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that analysts can then confirm and fine-tune, making sure the last items are both detailed and precise. Analysts might team up with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collaborative fashion, enhancing each version of their analyses and providing completed intelligence more rapidly.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files saved on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials placed enormous pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it pointed to a continuous effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to equate each page, examine it by hand for appropriate material, and include that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the very first 2 steps in that process could have been achieved within days, possibly even hours, permitting experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

One of the most fascinating applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific questions and receive summed up, pertinent details from thousands of reports with source citations, assisting them make notified choices rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI provides numerous advantages, it likewise presents significant brand-new threats, specifically as foes develop similar technologies. China's developments in AI, particularly in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have yielded data sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on vast amounts of personal and behavioral data that can then be utilized for various functions, such as security and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software around the world might offer China with all set access to bulk data, notably bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment models, a specific concern in countries with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security neighborhood must think about how Chinese models developed on such extensive information sets can give China a tactical advantage.

And it is not simply China. The expansion of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly affordable costs. A lot of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using big language designs to quickly create and spread out incorrect and destructive content or to perform cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thus increasing the danger to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI designs will end up being attractive targets for enemies. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become important nationwide properties that should be safeguarded against enemies looking for to compromise or control them. The intelligence community need to buy establishing safe and secure AI models and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous evaluation to safeguard against potential risks. These groups can use AI to imitate attacks, uncovering potential weak points and developing strategies to reduce them. Proactive procedures, consisting of collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be vital.

THE NEW NORMAL

These challenges can not be wished away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to totally mature brings its own risks; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To guarantee that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term tactical insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the nation's intelligence community requires to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services should rapidly master making use of AI technologies and make AI a fundamental element in their work. This is the only sure method to guarantee that future U.S. presidents receive the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their foes, and safeguard the United States' delicate abilities and operations. Implementing these changes will require a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence experts mainly construct items from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI designs for voice and images analysis. Moving on, intelligence authorities need to check out consisting of a hybrid approach, in line with existing laws, using AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available information and improved with categorized details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence gathering might lead to an AI entity offering direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of normal and anomalous activity, automated imagery analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To speed up the shift, intelligence leaders must promote the benefits of AI combination, emphasizing the improved abilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of recently designated chief AI officers has been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to work as leads within their companies for promoting AI innovation and eliminating barriers to the technology's execution. Pilot tasks and early wins can build momentum and self-confidence in AI's abilities, encouraging broader adoption. These officers can utilize the expertise of national labs and other partners to evaluate and fine-tune AI designs, ensuring their efficiency and security. To institutionalise change, leaders ought to create other organizational incentives, consisting of promos and training chances, to reward innovative approaches and those workers and units that demonstrate reliable use of AI.

The White House has actually produced the policy required for using AI in nationwide security agencies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, secure, and credible AI detailed the guidance needed to fairly and safely use the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, is the nation's fundamental technique for utilizing the power and managing the risks of AI to advance national security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and companies to produce the facilities required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to purchase assessment abilities to guarantee that the United States is building dependable and high-performing AI technologies.

Intelligence and military neighborhoods are devoted to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have produced the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will require guidelines for how their analysts should utilize AI designs to make certain that intelligence items satisfy the intelligence community's standards for reliability. The federal government will also need to maintain clear assistance for dealing with the data of U.S. residents when it pertains to the training and use of big language models. It will be very important to stabilize using emerging innovations with protecting the personal privacy and civil liberties of people. This suggests augmenting oversight mechanisms, upgrading appropriate structures to reflect the capabilities and dangers of AI, and cultivating a culture of AI advancement within the nationwide security apparatus that utilizes the capacity of the innovation while protecting the rights and flexibilities that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the forefront of overhead and satellite images by developing a number of the essential innovations itself, winning the AI race will require that community to reimagine how it partners with personal industry. The personal sector, which is the main means through which the federal government can realize AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, data centers, and calculating power. Given those companies' improvements, intelligence agencies should focus on leveraging commercially available AI designs and refining them with categorized data. This approach allows the intelligence community to quickly broaden its capabilities without having to go back to square one, permitting it to remain competitive with adversaries. A recent collaboration between NASA and IBM to produce the world's biggest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the model to the AI community as an open-source project-is an excellent presentation of how this kind of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.

As the nationwide security neighborhood integrates AI into its work, it must ensure the security and durability of its models. Establishing standards to deploy generative AI firmly is crucial for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its cooperation with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States faces growing rivalry to form the future of the international order, it is urgent that its intelligence firms and military profit from the nation's development and management in AI, focusing especially on large language models, to provide faster and more relevant details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to browse a more complicated, competitive, and content-rich world.