GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With up to date news and a little but lively 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address humanity's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing concerns that are less easy to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter model which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months back so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and visualchemy.gallery ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and gauged its response. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the key points from the posts. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially given comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and koha-community.cz the Super Bowl is an important occasion, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, oke.zone I'm trying to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think about the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are mindful of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a substantial number however possible offered their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the probability that they'll use it several times, especially if it's effective early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears considerable since it reveals he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That might imply he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's also included in a fight with Drake, which may offer him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement suit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel compelled to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a danger that such content may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant moves on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which may offer him more imaginative liberty. Plus, his past behavior recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, ura.cc even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to trigger offense and that he in fact found it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, specifically with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that may influence this prediction.

First, I check out the short articles offered. They all mention the historic data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a minor edge, but it's not a substantial distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally considered random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I ought to consider whether this historical bias should influence the possibility.

After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic data reveals a slight preference for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists however doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the exact same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite severe accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful contact recent games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ludicrous." They state there's no proof of methodical bias. That's a strong statement from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Taking a look at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], passfun.awardspace.us and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that analytical analysis doesn't show any pattern of towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect less charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, ura.cc however extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, clashofcryptos.trade a minimum of it can gain from this.